Skip to main content

    Leading vs. Lagging Indicators of Community Health

    Learn the difference between leading and lagging indicators to proactively measure, manage, and prove the value of your community programme.

    Published
    26 September 2026

    In community management, metrics are categorised into two fundamental types: leading indicators and lagging indicators. Leading indicators are predictive, input-focused metrics that signal future outcomes and allow for proactive intervention. They measure activities and behaviours that are believed to drive success. In contrast, lagging indicators are output-focused metrics that measure past results and confirm long-term trends. They tell you what has already happened and are often the ultimate goals of a community programme, such as retention or growth. Understanding and utilising both is critical for effectively measuring, managing, and articulating the value of a community.

    Why it matters — Leading vs. Lagging Indicators of Community Health

    This is a preview. The full piece is free for members (3 reads a day) and unlimited with Premium.

    Read the full piece on Led by Community (free account, 3 reads a day)