Skip to main content

    The Fallacy of Activity Metrics in Value-Based Communities

    Discover why traditional activity metrics like MAU and DAU are misleading for paid, transformation-focused communities and learn what to measure instead.

    Published
    26 September 2026

    The Fallacy of Activity Metrics is the common but mistaken belief that high-level activity data, such as Monthly Active Users (MAU) or Daily Active Users (DAU), accurately reflects the health, value, and success of a community. This fallacy is particularly dangerous in value-based communities, such as paid memberships, professional networks, or learning cohorts, where the primary goal is member transformation, not simply time spent on a platform. It promotes a focus on superficial presence over meaningful participation, leading to flawed strategies and a misunderstanding of a community's true impact.

    Why it matters — The Fallacy of Activity Metrics in Value-Based Communities

    Relying on activity metrics as a primary indicator of community health can be profoundly damaging. When community leaders and stakeholders prioritise increasing login counts, they inadvertently incentivise the wrong behaviour. The strategic focus shifts from fostering deep connections and facilitating valuable outcomes to simply driving traffic. This can lead to decisions that actively harm the member experience, such as sending excessive notifications or creating low-value content designed to generate clicks rather than conversation.

    This is a preview. The full piece is free for members (3 reads a day) and unlimited with Premium.

    Read the full piece on Led by Community (free account, 3 reads a day)